Skip to content
OCRV Center
Home

Repair Files: What Arrived, What Teardown Found, What It Took

Written by Structural Repair Lead, Structural and Frame Lead, OCRV Center. Reviewed by Claims Coordinator

In shortEight jobs written up the way the work order reads: arrival condition, teardown findings, the mid job change nobody predicted, and hours by department. No names, no totals, no ratings.

What is in an OCRV Center case study?

Each file describes one repair performed at our Yorba Linda shop: the unit and its damage on arrival, what came to light once panels were off, what changed the scope, and the labor hours and shop days it consumed. Several involve owners based around Rancho Santa Margarita.

  • The unit is described; no customer is named or characterised
  • Labor is stated as hours in a named department at the posted rate
  • Every file names the finding that changed the scope
  • No file states a total, because parts and materials vary per unit
Files published
8Coach, fifth wheel, trailer, van, bus, work van, Airstream and vintage
How labor is reported
Hours by department$210 per hour body and paint, $260 per hour mechanical and electrical
Shortest file
11 shop daysA Sprinter roof strike with one substituted part
Longest file
26 shop daysPhase one subfloor and frame work on a 1968 trailer
Markup used
CreativeWork and QuotationNo self authored review markup and no rating figures anywhere

Last verified

The most useful thing a repair shop can publish is not a testimonial. It is the work order. Owners trying to judge an estimate want to know what a comparable job actually involved: how many hours went where, what appeared once the panels came off, and what changed between authorization and delivery. That information is normally invisible, which is why estimates feel arbitrary.

So these eight files read like the job did. Each names the unit, the damage, the teardown findings and the moment the scope moved, then gives labor hours by department and the number of shop days consumed. What they do not contain is a customer, a rating or a total, and the reasons for each of those omissions are set out below.

01

What each file contains

Five things, in the same order every time, because that is the order the work happened in. The unit as it arrived, including the damage description written at intake. What teardown exposed, which on envelope and structural work is routinely larger than what was visible. The change that moved the scope, which every substantial job has. The labor hours by department and the shop days. And how the unit left, including anything the owner should watch.

The intent is that an owner holding an estimate for something similar can compare like with like. If your quote says twenty two body hours for a cap repair and the closest file here used sixty eight for a larger job, at least you know roughly where you sit and what question to ask next. That is a more useful service than a page of praise.

02

The eight files

They were chosen for range rather than for drama. Two involve carriers and two were entirely owner funded. Three are recreational envelope jobs, two are commercial, one is a municipal unit and one is phase one of a long restoration. The mid job change in each is the part worth reading, because that is the part no estimate can predict.

  1. A 40 foot diesel pusher with a freeway debris strike through the lower front cap
  2. A bunkhouse fifth wheel whose living room slide came back out of square after storage lot contact
  3. A 28 foot travel trailer with two saturated roof decking bays and two separate water entries
  4. A Sprinter based camper van struck in a parking structure, with a discontinued solar panel
  5. A Type C school bus with rear body damage and an emergency exit door that would not latch
  6. A high roof cargo van rear impact where the shelving upfit tore from the wall track
  7. A 2004 Airstream with a canyon road scrape and a previous repair using the wrong rivets
  8. A 1968 sixteen foot trailer, phase one: subfloor, outriggers and a cracked axle plate
03

How labor and time are reported here

Labor appears as hours in a named department. Body, paint, fiberglass and structural work is $210 per hour. Slide drives, appliances, house electrical and plumbing are $260 per hour. Where a fault had to be found before it could be quoted, diagnostic time is $285 per hour with a one hour minimum. Multiply and you have the labor portion of each job to within rounding.

Shop days are calendar days the unit occupied a bay, including waiting on parts, because that is the number owners actually plan around. A job with 44 labor hours and 13 shop days is not idle; it is a unit that spent four of those days waiting for freight while the bay stayed committed. Separating the two figures is the only honest way to describe RV work.

04

Three things deliberately left out

No customers. Nobody is named, quoted or characterised, and no unit is identified in a way that would point at its owner. The unit is the subject of the file and that is sufficient. Where a quotation appears it is from the technician or lead who performed the work, attributed by role.

No totals, and no star ratings. A total would require us to publish the parts and materials from a real invoice, which varies enormously between two units with identical damage, and quoting one would mislead every reader whose unit differs. Ratings are absent because a shop authoring its own review markup is not a credible signal, and there is no aggregate score anywhere on this site.

  • Named customers: never, on any file
  • Invoice totals: never, because parts and materials are unit specific
  • Ratings and review counts: not used anywhere on this site
  • Quotations: from the technician who did the work, attributed by role
Appendix

Appendix: questions and answers

Why do none of these files give a final invoice total?
Because the total would mislead. Two identical cap repairs can differ by thousands in parts alone depending on availability, whether a molded part was involved and how much paint area the geometry forced. Publishing hours by department lets you compute the labor portion accurately and ask about parts separately, which is the honest breakdown.
Are these jobs typical or were they chosen because they went well?
They were chosen for range across unit types and funding paths, and each includes the finding that made it harder than expected. Two ran over their original estimate and both say so. A file that omitted the mid job change would be useless for the purpose these pages exist to serve.
Will my repair be published as a case study?
Only if you are asked and you agree, and even then no identifying detail appears. Most of the value in these files is technical rather than personal, so a published file describes a unit, a damage pattern and a scope. Your own job file, with photographs and measurements, is yours on request regardless.
How should I use these files against an estimate I already have?
Find the closest unit and damage type, compare hours by department rather than totals, and note which findings that file discovered at teardown. Then ask your shop whether their scope accounts for those. The point is not that your job should match; it is knowing which questions have already proven worth asking.
Next step

Open a file on this repair

Tell us the vehicle, what happened and whether a claim is open. We will tell you what the scope looks like and what it takes to get you back on the road.